What Is the Difference Between an Audit and an Inspection?

The complexities of health and safety management can feel daunting, especially with the constant evolution of processes and regulations. It's easy to see why terms like audits and inspections, which often overlap in purpose, might get mixed up. Understanding the nuances between these concepts is key to ensuring effective compliance and workplace safety.

While these terms are often used interchangeably, they are actually two separate processes. In this post, we'll walk through the key differences between audits and inspections to provide you with a better understanding.

Inspections and Audits: ISO Standard Definition

Inspections and audits share a common objective: creating a safer workplace for employees. However, their approaches to achieving this goal diverge. To gain a deeper understanding, let's examine the definitions of inspections and audits provided by the ISO 9000:2015 standards.

According to these standards, an inspection is defined as a "determination of conformity to specified requirements" (3.11.7). On the other hand, an audit is defined as "the systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining objective evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which audit criteria are fulfilled" (3.13.1).

While inspections assess the effectiveness of current safety processes in ensuring the health and safety of employees, audits delve into a more comprehensive evaluation of how an organization manages health and safety. To draw a comparison, you can think of audits as part of the "Check" phase in the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, while inspections align with the "Do" phase.

To create a solid workplace health and safety plan, it is crucial to understand the distinctions between audits and inspections. Let's explore the key differences:

The Key Differences Between Audits and Inspections:

1. They’re carried out by different parties

Inspections are typically conducted by a safety officer who assesses the workplace for potential hazards. Due to their familiarity with the environment, inspections are often performed by internal team members. Audits, however, are conducted by independent parties, either external or from a separate department.

2. They have distinct areas of focus

Inspections primarily focus on identifying safety hazards in the workplace, while audits concentrate on evaluating the processes adopted by an organization to prevent identified hazards and address worker safety issues.

In simpler terms, inspections revolve around people, places and things while audits center on operations, processes and programs. Consequently, it is possible to audit a safety inspection program, but inspections cannot be performed on safety audits.

For example, during an inspection in a manufacturing facility, the focus might be on identifying machine guarding deficiencies, fire hazards or ergonomic risks. In contrast, an audit would assess the effectiveness of the safety management system, training programs, incident reporting and corrective actions related to those identified hazards.

3. They don’t occur at the same frequency

Safety inspections require frequent occurrence to ensure proactive hazard identification and timely mitigation. They are invaluable for investigating the causes of accidents and maintaining incident records for senior leaders' reference.

Audits, on the other hand, are more time-consuming and detailed. Depending on the scope, an audit can span from a few hours to several weeks. As a result, they are less frequent.

While some organizations conduct annual audits, this approach may inadvertently lead to safety compliance becoming an isolated goal, with a flurry of activity preceding the audit and less emphasis on safety for the remainder of the year. Optimal practice involves scheduling audits throughout the year and reserving the last month for a comprehensive, in-depth audit.

4. Audits tend to be slightly more complicated

Inspections are typically straightforward processes where an inspector uses a checklist to evaluate specific safety points systematically. In contrast, audits are more comprehensive and involve collaboration among multiple team members from various areas of the business. Audits not only assess compliance but also analyze broader systems and processes to identify underlying risks and opportunities for improvement.

Data from various sources, such as inspections, surveys, policies and documentation, is utilized by auditors to identify potential risks and areas for improvement. These steps help organizations gain insights into necessary changes to achieve their health and safety goals.

During an audit at an oil refinery, the process would go beyond surface-level checks to thoroughly evaluate critical operations. The audit team would analyze a wide array of data, such as inspection reports, incident records, training documentation, maintenance logs and emergency response procedures.

By reviewing this comprehensive information, auditors can uncover systemic issues, provide recommendations for process enhancements and confirm adherence to regulatory standards. This in-depth approach ensures a safer and more efficient operation while promoting compliance across the board.

5. The outcome is never quite the same

The outcomes of inspections and audits differ significantly. At the conclusion of an inspection, you receive a list of identified safety hazards or health risks. For instance, if an inspection reveals an uneven surface on a factory floor that increases the risk of slips or falls, the recommendation would be to flatten the surface to enhance worker safety.

Audits, however, dive deeper; they seek to understand the root causes of identified issues and outline associated risks. Audits culminate in actionable recommendations for senior leaders to address the identified risks and make the workplace safer.

Following an audit in a construction company, the findings might reveal gaps such as inadequate safety training, inconsistent enforcement of policies and poor communication about workplace hazards. To address these issues, the recommendations would focus on initiatives like developing more robust training programs, establishing clearer communication protocols and implementing measures to improve accountability and awareness among employees and management. These steps help build a more proactive approach to mitigating risks and fostering a safer working environment.

Now that you understand the distinction between audits and inspections, you can recognize their unique roles as vital components of the overall safety management process.

To learn more about how you can streamline your audits and inspections using mobile technology for real-time completion, click below!